[ Предположительная тональность: D ] In article 2l1vvl$epg@nof.abdn.ac.uk> ucs2037@nof.abdn.ac.uk (ucs2037 ) writes: |MAD Mosher (I.R.Purdie@bradford.ac.uk) wrote: |: Anyone got this tab? The main "recognised" bit would be fine - you know |: the "dum-diddle-dumdum dumdumdum, dum-*diddle*-dum-dum dumdumdum, dumdum, |: dadadaaaaaa" bit :) | |Play around with this: | |E ---------- |B ---------- |G ---------- |D ---------- |A ---------- |E 0-0-0-2-2-2-0-0-0-3-3-3-0-0-0----- | That gives the general idea, but try this for the whole riff: D----- A-------- E--0-2-2-2-2--0-0-0-0-3-3-3-3--2-2-2- (repeat twice) D--------------------------------------1-0------- A--------------------------------------------2-0-2-- E--0-2-2-2-2--0-0-0-0-3-3-3-3--2-1-0----------- If you want some chords try Em, EmaddC, Em6, EmaddC and repeat EADGBE EADGBE EADGBE 022000 022010 022020 Em EmaddC Em6 Howard Howard Wright \(???\) (spxhaw@thor.cf.ac.uk) wrote: : If you want some chords try Em, EmaddC, Em6, EmaddC and repeat : EADGBE EADGBE EADGBE : 022000 022010 022020 : Em EmaddC Em6 If I might suggest a small technical correction, the correct chords should be Em, Em+5, Em6, Em+5. The EmaddC construction would produce a chord consisting of EGBC. What's actually happening in this minor cliche is that the 5th note is being augmented up and then brought back down to a normal 5th, while the root and 3rd remain constant. These chord structures would also work: Em Em+5 Em6 Em+5 ------ ------ ------ ------ 0x54xx 0x55xx 0x56xx 0x55xx